Sunscreens: Do They Cause Skin Cancer?
With complete references for researchers
by Hans R. Larsen, MSc ChE
|
A
comprehensive review of the evidence linking the use of chemicals in sunscreens to an
increased risk of melanoma and skin cancer (basal carcinoma and squamous
cell carcinoma) – with extensive references.
|
| In 1991 Professor Johan
Moan of the Norwegian Cancer Institute made an astounding discovery. He
found that the yearly incidence of melanoma in Norway had increased by
350% for men and by 440% for women during the period 1957 to 1984. He also
determined that there had been no change in the ozone layer over this
period of time. He concludes his report in the British Journal of
Cancer by stating "Ozone depletion is not the cause of the increase in
skin cancers"(1).
|
SKIN CANCER
There are three major forms of skin cancer.
BASAL CELL CARCINOMA is the most common form of skin cancer. It
occurs most frequently in men who spend a great deal of time outdoors and
primarily produces lesions on the head and neck(2). Basal cell carcinoma
rarely spreads throughout the body but can invade neighbouring bone and
nerves(3).
SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA is the second most common skin cancer.
It primarily affects people who sunburn easily, tan poorly, and have blue
eyes and red or blonde hair. Squamous cell carcinoma most commonly
develops from actinic keratoses and can metastasize if left untreated.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the lip is 12 times more common among men than
among women(4).
MALIGNANT MELANOMA is the rarest form of skin cancer but is the
most deadly. It affects the cells which produce melanin and seems to be
more prevalent among city-dwellers than among people who work
out-of-doors. It does not necessarily occur on sun-exposed areas of the
body and is thought to be linked to brief, intense periods of sun exposure
and a history of severe sunburn in childhood or adolescence. Malignant
melanoma metastasizes easily and is often fatal if not caught in
time(2,5).
|
| The skin cancer epidemic
is a worldwide phenomenon. In 1978 there were approximately 480,000 cases
of non-melanoma skin cancer in the United States alone. This is expected
to rise to over one million in 1994(6). Malignant melanoma is growing at a
rate of 7% per year in the United States. In 1991 cancer experts estimated
that there would be about 32,000 cases during the year of which 6,500
would be fatal(7). In Canada melanoma incidence rose by 6% per year for
men and by 4.6% per year for women during the period 1970-1986(8).
Australia has the highest melanoma rate in the world. For men the rate
doubled between 1980 and 1987 and for women it increased by more than
50%(9). It is now estimated that by age 75 two out of three Australians
will have been treated for some form of skin cancer(10).
If the ozone layer has not yet changed significantly except at the
poles, then what is causing the enormous increase in skin cancer?
The sunscreen connection The Australian experience provides
the first clue. The rise in melanoma has been exceptionally high in
Queensland where the medical establishment has long and vigorously
promoted the use of sunscreens. Queensland now has more incidences of
melanoma per capita than any other place. Worldwide, the greatest rise in
melanoma has been experienced in countries where chemical sunscreens have
been heavily promoted(11).
Drs. Cedric and Frank Garland of the University of California are the
foremost opponents of the use of chemical sunscreens. They point out that,
although sunscreens do protect against sunburn, there is no scientific
proof that they protect against melanoma or basal cell carcinoma in
humans(11). There is, however, some evidence that regular use of
sunscreens helps prevent the formation of actinic keratoses, the
precursors of squamous cell carcinoma(12).
The Garland brothers strongly believe that the increased use of
chemical sunscreens is the primary cause of the skin cancer epidemic. They
emphasize that people using sunscreen tend to stay longer in the sun
because they do not get a sunburn - they develop a false sense of
security(7). Chemical sunscreens are formulated to absorb UVB radiation,
they let most of the UVA rays through(7). UVA rays penetrate deeper into
the skin and are strongly absorbed by the melanocytes which are involved
both in melanin production (sun tanning) and in melanoma formation(11).
UVA rays also have a depressing effect on the immune system(13).
|
ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION
UVA rays constitute 90-95% of the ultraviolet light reaching the
earth. They have a relatively long wavelength (320-400 nm) and are not
absorbed by the ozone layer. UVA light penetrates the furthest into the
skin and is involved in the initial stages of suntanning. UVA tends to
suppress the immune function and is implicated in premature aging of the
skin(2,13,14).
UVB rays are partially absorbed by the ozone layer and have a
medium wavelength (290-320 nm). They do not penetrate the skin as far as
the UVA rays do and are the primary cause of sunburn. They are also
responsible for most of the tissue damage which results in wrinkles and
aging of the skin and are implicated in cataract formation(2).
UVC rays have the shortest wavelength (below 290 nm) and are
almost totally absorbed by the ozone layer. As the ozone layer thins UVC
rays may begin to contribute to sunburning and premature aging of the
skin(2).
All forms of ultraviolet radiation are believed to contribute to the
development of skin cancer(2).
|
| Most chemical sunscreens
contain from 2 to 5% of benzophenone or its derivatives (oxybenzone,
benzophenone-3) as their active ingredient. Benzophenone is one of the
most powerful free radical generators known to man. It is used in
industrial processes to initiate chemical reactions and promote
cross-linking(15). Benzophenone is activated by ultraviolet light. The
absorbed energy breaks benzophenone's double bond to produce two free
radical sites. The free radicals desperately look for a hydrogen atom to
make them "feel whole again"(15). They may find this hydrogen atom among
the other ingredients of the sunscreen, but it is conceivable that they
could also find it on the surface of the skin and thereby initiate a chain
reaction which could ultimately lead to melanoma and other skin cancers.
Researchers at the Harvard Medical School have recently discovered that
psoralen, another ultraviolet light-activated free radical generator, is
an extremely efficient carcinogen. They found that the rate of squamous
cell carcinoma among patients with psoriasis, who had been repeatedly
treated with UVA light after a topical application of psoralen, was 83
times higher than among the general population(16).
The benefits of sunlight Some scientists believe that UV
light causes skin cancer through the combined effect of suppression of the
immune system and damage to DNA(10,17). Exposure to UV light is, however,
not all bad. Most of the body's vitamin D supply, about 75% of it, is
generated by the skin's exposure to UVB rays(18). Using a sunscreen
drastically lowers the cutaneous production of vitamin D3(19). A low blood
level of vitamin D is known to increase the risk for the development of
breast and colon cancer and may also accelerate the growth of
melanoma(18,19,20).
Dr. Gordon Ainsleigh in California believes that the use of sunscreens
causes more cancer deaths than it prevents. He estimates that the 17%
increase in breast cancer observed between 1991 and 1992 may be the result
of the pervasive use of sunscreens over the past decade(20). Recent
studies have also shown a higher rate of melanoma among men who regularly
use sunscreens and a higher rate of basal cell carcinoma among women using
sunscreens(11,21).
Dr. Ainsleigh estimates that 30,000 cancer deaths in the United States
alone could be prevented each year if people would adopt a regimen of
regular, moderate sun exposure(20).
Although the medical establishment still strongly supports the use of
sunscreens there is a growing consensus among progressive researchers that
the use of sunscreens does not prevent skin cancer and, as a matter of
fact, may promote skin cancers as well as colon and breast cancer.
The bottom line So what should you do to protect yourself as
much as possible against these cancers? Summarizing current research the
following recommendations appear reasonable:
- DO NOT rely on the use of sunscreens to protect you against
skin cancer.
- DO NOT try to get a tan by visiting a tanning studio. The
rays from their UV lamps are extremely harmful and the tan produced does
not have the protective effect of a sunlight-induced tan(2,7).
- DO try to develop a moderate natural suntan unless you have
extremely sensitive skin and burn easily. Regular and moderate
unprotected sun exposure in the early morning or late afternoon will
help maintain a protective tan and keep your vitamin D stores at an
optimum level(20).
- DO wear protective clothing and a wide-brimmed hat when you
are outside. Avoid sun exposure between 10 AM and 3 PM if at all
possible. Remember that UV rays, particularly UVA, are present even on
cloudy days(7).
- DO wear sunglasses that filter out 100% of the ultraviolet
light to protect yourself against the development of cataracts(7).
- DO remember that sunlight is strongly reflected from sand,
snow, ice, and concrete and can increase your direct sunlight exposure
by 10 to 50%(2).
- DO make sure you get enough vitamin D3 and beta-carotene, if
necessary through supplementation. Recent research has shown that taking
30 mg of beta-carotene a day protects against the suppression of the
immune system by UVA rays(13).
- DO make sure to supplement your diet with antioxidants. Dr.
Abram Hoffer in Victoria, Canada recommends that vitamin C, vitamin E,
and selenium be used as a protection against the damages of excessive
ultraviolet radiation. He suggests daily dosages of 3 grams or more of
vitamin C, 800 IU of vitamin E, and 200 micrograms of selenium
(l-selenomethionine)(22). Vitamins C and E also protect against cataract
formation(23,24).
- DO cut down on the fat in your diet. Recent research has
shown that patients with non- melanoma skin cancers can reduce their
risk of developing additional actinic keratoses (precursors to skin
cancer) by switching to a low fat diet(25).
|
SUNSCREENS
Sunscreens are designed to protect against sunburn (UVB rays) and
generally provide little protection against UVA rays. They come in two
forms:
CHEMICAL SUNSCREENS contain chemicals such as benzophenone or
oxybenzone (benzophenone-3) as the active ingredient. They prevent sunburn
by absorbing the ultraviolet (UVB) rays(2).
PHYSICAL SUNSCREENS contain inert minerals such as titanium
dioxide, zinc oxide, or talc and work by reflecting the ultraviolet
(UVA and UVB) rays away from the skin(2).
A sunscreen with a SPF of 15 filters out approximately 94% of the UVB
rays. One with a SPF of 30 filters out 97%. The SPF applies for UVB rays
only. The protection provided against UVA rays in chemical sunscreens is
about 10% of the UVB rating(26).
|
- DO wear a physical sunscreen with a SPF of 30 if you
absolutely must be out in the sun for extended periods of time(22).
Physical sunscreens containing , zinc oxide, or corn starch work by reflecting the UV radiation rather than by absorbing it.
Sunscreens are tested by using artificial UV light and a screen with a
SPF of 30 is not twice as effective as one with a factor of 15(17).
Also, reapplying sunscreen during the day does not extend the period of
protection. Even "broad-spectrum" sunscreens are not very good in
filtering out UVA rays(26). A natural suntan is probably more effective.
Read the labels on your products and avoid
benzophene, diethanolamine (DEA), triethanolamine (TEA), propylene
glycol (PG), polyethyleneglycol (PEG), dea, sodium
lauryl sulfate (SLS), mineral oil, petrolatum, lanolin .
- DO see your healthcare provider if you spot any unusual moles
or growth on your skin - particularly if they are irregular in shape,
bleed, itch, or appear to be changing. Most skin cancers can be cured if
caught in time(27).
The saga of sunscreens and skin cancer is far from over. Research is
continuing and new findings are being published at an accelerated pace.
But until we know the whole story, it would seem prudent to take
precautions based on what we do know.
Neways International has been a company manufacturing safe,
effective, alternative products that really work for over 15 years..
***** |
Sunscreen Use Not Tied to Malignant
Melanoma
By David Douglas
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Jul 01 - Contrary to some previous
findings, users of topical sunscreens appear to be at no increased
risk of developing malignant melanoma, Wisconsin-based researchers
report in the July issue of the American Journal of Public Health.
"The issue of sunscreen's impact on melanoma risk has been
debated for some time," lead researcher Dr. Michael Huncharek told
Reuters Health. The current investigation, he pointed out, "was
motivated to a large degree" by "a review of the existing literature
by Sloan-Kettering epidemiologists...suggesting that sunscreen
increased melanoma risk."
Dr. Huncharek and Bruce Kupelnick of Meta-Analysis Research Group
in Stevens Point felt "a more rigorous methodological and
statistical evaluation was necessary," and they thus conducted a
meta-analysis using data from 11 case-control studies of sunscreen
use and melanoma involving 9067 patients.
"We found," Dr. Huncharek continued, "that a number of study
design issues contributed to the misinterpretation of the existing
data by reviewers producing only 'narrative', non-quantitative
reviews of the data. When one looks critically at the data it is
clear that the source of patients for some of these studies
significantly influenced study outcome."
In particular, data from studies derived using patients from
hospitals were statistically heterogenous. The results "differed
substantially when compared to each other--far more than expected by
chance alone." No such heterogeneity was found among the studies
deriving their patients from population tumor registries.
"The bottom line," Dr. Huncharek observed, "is that the
population-based studies show no evidence of statistical
heterogeneity--meaning that this group of studies show consistent
results across the studies and show no evidence of increased risk of
melanoma with sunscreen use."
"Sunlight remains the most important risk for the development of
melanoma, although the exact biological interaction of sunlight with
other host factors such as skin tone, hair color, genetic
background, remains obscure," he concluded. "There is no evidence
that sunscreens increase the risk of developing melanoma, and our
study actually provides indirect evidence that it is truly
protective."
Am J Public Health 2002;92:1173-1177.
REFERENCES
- Moan, J. & Dahlback, A. The relationship between skin cancers,
solar radiation and ozone depletion. British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 65,
No. 6, June 1992, pp. 916-21
- Harmful effects of ultraviolet radiation. Journal of the American
Medical Association, Vol. 262, No. 3, July 21, 1989, pp. 380-84
- Haynes, Harley A. Primary cancer of the skin. Harrison's Principles
of Internal Medicine, McGraw- Hill, 7th ed., 1974, pp. 2024-25
- Hacker, Steven M. & Flowers, Franklin P. Squamous cell carcinoma
of the skin. Postgraduate Medicine, Vol. 93, No. 8, June 1993, pp.
115-26
- Lee, John A.H. The relationship between malignant melanoma of skin
and exposure to sunlight. Photochemistry and Photobiology, Vol. 50, No.
4, 1989, pp. 493-96
- Miller, Dena L. & Weinstock, Martin A. Nonmelanoma skin cancer
in the United States: incidence. Journal of the American Academy of
Dermatology, Vol. 30, No. 5, Pt. 1, May 1994, pp. 774-78
- Skolnick, Andrew A. Revised regulations for sunscreen labelling
expected soon from FDA. Journal of the American Medical Assocation, Vol.
265, No. 24, June 26, 1991, pp. 3217-20
- Statistics Canada, Canadian Cancer Statistics 1991.
- Reynolds, Tom. Sun plays havoc with light skin down under. Journal
of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 84, No. 18, September 16, 1992,
pp. 1392-94
- Ozone depletion and health. The Lancet, December 10, 1988, p. 1377
- Garland, Cedric F., et al. Could sunscreens increase melanoma risk?
American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, No. 4, April 1992, pp.
614-15
- Dover, Jeffrey S. & Arndt, Kenneth A. Dermatology. Journal of
the American Medical Association, Vol. 271, No. 21, June 1, 1994, pp.
1662-63
- Fuller, Cindy J., et al. Effect of beta-carotene supplementation on
photosuppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity in normal young men.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 56, 1992, pp. 684-90
- Fitzpatrick, T.B. & Haynes, H.A. Photosensitivity and other
reactions to light. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine,
McGraw-Hill, 7th ed., 1974, pp. 281-84
- Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 13, 3rd ed.,
1981, pp. 367-68
- Stern, Robert S. and Laid, Nan. The carcinogenic risk of treatments
for severe psoriasis. Cancer, Vol. 73, No. 11, June 1, 1994, pp. 2759-64
- Wright, Brett. Sunscreens and the protection racket. New Scientist,
January 22, 1994, pp. 21-2
- Garland, Frank C., et al. Geographic variation in breast cancer
mortality in the United States: a hypothesis involving exposure to solar
radiation. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 19, 1990, pp. 614-22
- Koh, Howard K. & Lew, Robert A. Sunscreens and melanoma:
implications for prevention. Journal of the National Cancer Institute,
Vol. 86, No. 2, January 19, 1994, pp. 78-9
- Ainsleigh, H. Gordon. Beneficial effects of sun exposure on cancer
mortality. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 22, February 1993, pp. 132-40
- Garland, Cedric F. et al. Effect of sunscreens on UV
radiation-induced enhancement of melanoma growth in mice. Journal of the
National Cancer Institute, Vol. 86, No. 10, May 18, 1994, pp. 798-801
- Goodall, John & Hoffer, Abram. Protection against ultraviolet
radiation. Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol. 147, No. 6,
September 15, 1992, pp. 839-40
- Robertson, J.M., et al. Vitamin E intake and risk of cataracts in
humans, Annals of the New York Academy of Science, Vol. 570, 1989, pp.
372-82
- Knekt, Paul, et al. Serum antioxidant vitamins and risk of
cataracts. British Medical Journal, Vol. 305, December 5, 1992, pp.
1392-94
- Black, Homer S., et al. Effect of a low-fat diet on the incidence of
actinic keratosis. The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 330, No.
18, May 5, 1994, pp. 1272-75
- Kaidbey, Kays & Gange, R. William. Comparison of methods of
assessing photoprotection against ultraviolet A in vivo. Journal of the
American Academy of Dermatology, Vol. 16, No. 2, Pt. 1, February 1987,
pp. 346-53
- McDonald, Charles J. Status of screening for skin cancer. Cancer
(supplement), Vol. 72, No. 3, August 1, 1993, pp. 1066-70
This article was also published in the International Journal
of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, Vol 12, No 12, December
1994, pp.17-19.
For Safe
products and sunscreens without harmful chemicals or call 888 377 8877
| |
|