The "Milk Is Milk" Industry
Campaign Threatens Public Health, 2005
CHICAGO, Feb. 4 (AScribe Newswire) -- The
Cancer Prevention Coalition and Organic Consumers
Association today released the following statement
by Samuel S. Epstein, M.D., professor emeritus,
Environmental & Occupational Medicine, University of
Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health;
Chairman, Cancer Prevention Coalition; and Ronnie
Cummins, National Director, Organic Consumers
Association.
Last month, the Hudson Institute's
agribusiness-funded Center for Global Food Issues
launched an aggressive "Milk is Milk" campaign to
assure consumers that there is no difference between
natural milk and that from cows injected with
Monsanto's genetically-engineered or recombinant
Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH ) to increase milk
production and profitability. This campaign is also
aimed at preventing organic dairy farmers and
retailers from making "false or misleading claims to
be hormone-free, (and) nutritional and animal
welfare perceptions, such as happier cows."
Responding to Hudson's complaints, the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) announced that it will take
action against such misleading marketing practices.
However, contrary to Hudson, there is a
wealth of scientific information on the toxic
veterinary effects of rBGH, major differences
between rBGH and natural milk, and cancer risks
posed by rBGH milk. Revealingly, Hudson uses the
term rBST, recombinant Bovine Somatotropin, avoiding
any reference to the word"Hormone" in Monsanto's
original acronym rBGH.
Cows hyper-stimulated by repeated rBGH
injections are seriously stressed. Such evidence,
detailed in confidential Monsanto files submitted to
the FDA in 1987, was anonymously leaked to one of us
(Epstein) in November 1989. These files revealed
widespread pathological lesions, infertility, and
chronic mastitis, treated with illegal antibiotics.
Acting on this information, in 1990 the House
Committee on Government Operations charged"that
Monsanto and the FDA have chosen to suppress and
manipulate animal health test data--in efforts to
approve commercial use" of rBGH. This charge is also
consistent with the Committee's 1986 report,"Human
Food Safety and the Regulation of Animal Drugs."
This concluded that the "FDA has consistently
disregarded its responsibility--has repeatedly put
what it perceives are interests of veterinarians and
the livestock industry ahead of its legal obligation
to protect consumers--jeopardizing the health and
safety of consumers of meat, milk and poultry."
By 1994, when FDA approved the use of rBGH
under Monsanto's trade name Posilac, the label
insert, seen only by dairy farmers, admitted that
"its use is associated with increased frequency of
use of medication in cows for mastitis, "and some 20
other toxic effects. Such information on the Posilac
label is clearly inconsistent with Hudson's
criticism of "happier cow" claims by organic dairy
farmers.
Also contrary to Hudson, rBGH milk differs
qualitatively and quantitatively from natural milk.
Fat levels, particularly long chain saturated fatty
acids incriminated in heart disease, are increased,
while levels of a thyroid hormone enzyme are
increased. Furthermore, the high incidence of
chronic mastitis in rBGH injected cows results in
contamination of their milk with pus, and with
antibiotics used to treat the infection, with risks
of allergic reactions and nationwide antibiotic
resistance. Less well recognized is contamination of
rBGH milk with the hormone itself, and immunological
evidence of absorption of the hormone from the
intestine.
Even more seriously, rBGH milk is
contaminated with high levels of the natural
Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1), which
regulates cell growth, division and multiplication
throughout life, particularly in infants and young
children; Eli Lilly, in its application for
registration of rBGH, admitted that IGF-1 blood
levels of injected cows are increased up to
ten-fold. IGF-1 is resistant to pasteurization and
digestion, and is readily absorbed from the small
intestine. Monsanto's own data revealed that feeding
IGF-1 to adult rats for only two weeks significantly
increased body and liver weights, and bone length.
More critically, increased IGF-1 blood
levels have been incriminated as a major cause of
cancer. IGF-1 induces uncontrolled growth of normal
human breast cells in tissue culture, and has been
incriminated in their transformation to cancer
cells. Some 30 publications, dating back to 1985,
have reported strong associations between increased
IGF-1 blood levels with increased risks of colon,
and breast cancers. A 1998 study, based on 300
healthy nurses, showed that elevated IGF-1 blood
levels are strongly associated with up to a
seven-fold increased risk of developing
premenopausal breast cancer. This is the highest
known risk, approximating to that of a strong family
history. More recent studies have also shown strong
associations between increased IGF-1 blood levels
and prostate cancer.
Of related concern is evidence that
elevated IGF-1 levels inhibit the body's normal
ability to protect itself from microscopic cancers
by the natural process of programmed cell
destruction, known as "apoptosis." This promotes the
growth and invasiveness of early cancers, and also
decreases their responsiveness to chemotherapy.
Acting on this cumulative evidence, a 1999
European Commission report by a team of
internationally recognized experts concluded:
"Avoidance of rBGH dairy products in favor of
natural products would appear to be the most
practical and immediate dietary intervention to . .
. (achieve) the goal of preventing cancer."
Furthermore, this warning has been endorsed (in our
2002 publication in a leading scientific journal) by
over 100 leading independent experts in cancer
prevention and public health, besides citizen
activist groups. This endorsement was coupled with
insistence that the public has an absolute
right-to-know of information on avoidable causes of
cancer, a democratic right which the agribusiness
and FDA continue to subvert.
MEDIA CONTACTS
epstein@uic.edu; web www.preventcancer.com.
Ronnie Cummins, National Director, Organic
Consumers Association, 6101 Cliff Estate Road,
Little Marais, MN 55614; phone 218-226-4164; e-mail
ronnie@organicconsumers.org; web
www.organicconsumers.org.
|