|
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate
By David Steinman, from Healthy Living
Talk
to many health-conscious consumers today about personal care products
and one of their main topics of concern is use of the allegedly
dangerous shampoo ingredient, sodium lauryl sulfate. But is sodium
lauryl sulfate truly dangerous or has it received a bad rap? Or does the
answer lay somewhere between these two extremes?
This is not an inconsequential question, since
our recent marketplace review of more than 100 leading brands of
shampoos indicates that most contain this ingredient. The reason sodium
lauryl sulfate is used, we believe, is because it is an inexpensive
detergent and makes mixtures foam well.
All shampoos
are irritating. Shampoos rank among the products most often reported to
the Food and Drug Administration for association with scalp irritation,
stinging eyes, and tangled, split, and fuzzy hair. Most shampoos contain
synthetic detergents for washing hair. But is sodium lauryl sulfate the
culprit when it comes to irritation?
What Science
Says About Sodium Lauryl Sulfate
In its final report on the safety of sodium
lauryl sulfate, the Journal of the American College of Toxicology
notes that this ingredient has a "degenerative effect on the cell
membranes because of its protein denaturing properties." What's more,
the journal adds, "high levels of skin penetration may occur at even low
use concentration."
Interestingly, sodium lauryl sulfate "is used
around the world in clinical studies as a skin irritant," notes the
journal. The publication expressed additional concerns:
Carcinogenic
nitrosamines can form in the manufacturing of sodium lauryl sulfate
or by its inter-reaction with other nitrogen-bearing ingredients
within a formulation utilizing this ingredient.
Other studies have indicated that sodium
lauryl sulfate enters and maintains residual levels in the heart,
liver, lungs and brain from skin contact. This poses the question
whether it could be a serious potential health threat from its use
in shampoos, cleansers, and toothpastes.
Still other research has indicated sodium
lauryl sulfate may be damaging to the immune system, especially
within the skin. Skin layers may separate and inflame due to its
protein denaturing properties.
Although sodium lauryl sulfate is not
carcinogenic in experimental studies, it has been shown that it
causes severe epidermal changes in the area it is applied,
indicating a need for tumor-enhancing assays.
Additional studies have found that sodium
lauryl sulfate is heavily deposited on the skin surface and in the
hair follicles. Damage to
the hair follicle could result from such deposition.
Threat to Eye
Health
Damaging effects of sodium lauryl sulfate on
eye health are also of concern. In experimental, acute eye tests, a
solution of 10 percent sodium lauryl sulfate "caused corneal damage to
the . . . eyes if not irrigated or irrigation was delayed."
A solution of 5.1 percent "caused mild
irritation."
There may be another more insidious problem
with use of sodium lauryl sulfate. Bear with us if we use a little
scientific lingo in this section of the report. Your reward will be a
better appreciation for whether sodium lauryl sulfate poses undesirable
health effects. Often, in order to make a shampoo gentle to the eyes,
the manufacturer will utilize a combination of anionic surfactants
(i.e., detergents) with nonionic detergents. An anionic detergent
contains a negatively charged polar group. A nonionic detergent has no
polar end. Anionic detergents "display remarkable detergent,
emulsifying, and foaming properties."
Nonionics are
"generally considered as the mildest of all surfactants" whose use "has
been restricted because of poor foaming potential. They serve more often
as auxiliary detergents."
However, while anionic detergents
such as sodium lauryl sulfate are the most irritating to the eye,
nonionic detergents are less irritating. What's more, according to Tom
Conry, author of Consumer's Guide to Cosmetics, "Some of the
nonionic surfactants are believed to anesthetize the eyeball. Although
we have not been able to track down all of these anesthetizing
surfactants, the most common ones are cocamide MEA and DEA, and
lauramide MEA and DEA." This is why anionic detergents are frequently
combined with nonionic detergents to make shampoos gentle to the eye. In
essence, while more aggressive anionic detergents like sodium lauryl
sulfate are irritating the eye, the eyeball has been anesthetized by
nonionic detergents also in the formulation. Look at shampoo labels and
such combinations will be apparent.
Further, according
to the Journal of the American College of Toxicology, "Tests show
permanent eye damage in young animals from skin contact in non-eye
areas. Studies indicated sodium lauryl sulfate kept young eyes from
developing properly by possibly denaturing the proteins and not allowing
for proper structural formation. This damage was permanent."
Substitution of Gentler Detergents Poses Additional Risks
Unfortunately, many of the gentler
detergents that may be substituted for sodium lauryl sulfate pose their
own health hazards. For example, many companies have begun to use
ethoxylated detergents such as sodium laureth sulfate, cocamide DEA
or lauramide DEA because they tend to be less irritating.
Consumers
can recognize shampoo ingredients containing ethoxylated detergents and
related ingredients by looking for the prefix, word, or syllable PEG,
polyethylene, polyethylene glycol, polyoxyethylene, eth (as in
sodium laureth sulfate), or oxynol.
Both our own commissioned independent
laboratory testing and that of the federal government have documented
ethoxylated alcohol compounds are frequently contaminated with
1,4-dioxane, which is carcinogenic and is listed by the federal
government as a probable human carcinogen.
Also, according to a 1998 report from the
federal National Toxicology Program, two DEA-based compounds‹cocamide
DEA and lauramide DEA‹have been demonstrated to be cancer-causing in at
least in one species of animal.
The
Doctors' Prescription for Healthy Living/ Safe Shopper's Bible
Recommendation
According experts on the Cosmetic Ingredient
Review (CIR) panel (established by the Cosmetic Toiletry, and Fragrance
Association, a cosmetic industry trade association), both sodium lauryl
sulfate and its close chemical cousin ammonium lauryl sulfate
"appear to be safe in formulations designed for discontinuous, brief use
followed by thorough rinsing from the surface of the skin."
It should be recognized that shampoos represent
such brief, discontinuous use products that are thoroughly rinsed, thus
clearly minimizing the risk from sodium lauryl sulfate. It should also
be recognized that many people shampoo daily, and we really do not know
whether a lot of little exposures to sodium lauryl sulfate are dangerous
or not.
Given the lack of
adequate research and suggestive evidence, however, we believe it might
be wise for health-conscious consumers to seek products without sodium
lauryl sulfate, especially with regard to young children. Indeed,
consumers have the power to choose safe and perhaps even better products
without sodium lauryl sulfate.
This may be a very
wise choice for another reason. We have found very often the presence of
sodium lauryl sulfate in a shampoo formulation is a "marker" for the use
of other undesirable ingredients, including formaldehyde-containing
preservatives (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea); possible cancer-causing
wetting agents (e.g., cocamide DEA); and nitrosamine-forming agents
(e.g., triethanolamine). Also, it should be mentioned that in Germany,
where there is a concerted effort underway now to label cosmetics and
personal care products as certified natural, formulations containing
sodium lauryl sulfate, ammonium lauryl sulfate or sodium laureth sulfate
cannot be so certified, reports Michael Wrightson, president of Logona
Kosmetik.
References
"Bioassay of
1,4-Dioxane for possible carcinogenicity (CAS No. 123-91-1)." National
Toxicology Program, TR-80.
Bouillon, C. "Shampoos and hair conditioners." Clinics in
Dermatology, 1988; 6(3): 83-92.
Conry, T. Consumer's Guide to Cosmetics. Garden City, NY: Ancor Press
/ Doubleday, 1980, p. 74.
"Final report on the safety assessment of sodium lauryl sulfate."
Journal of the American College of Toxicology; 1983; 2(7).
Sixth Annual Report on Carcinogens, 1991. Summary. U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1991, pp.
192-195.
"Sodium lauryl sulfate ammonium lauryl sulfate."1996 CIR Compendium.
Washington, D.C.: Cosmetic Ingredient Review, 1996, pp. 134-135.
"Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of coconut oil acid
diethanolamine condensate (CAS NO. 68603-42-9) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1
mice (dermal studies)." National Toxicology Program, TR-479.
"Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of lauric acid diethanolamine
condensate (CAS NO. 120-40-1) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (dermal
studies)." National Toxicology Program, TR-480.
Wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_lauryl_sulfate
For products without
sodium lauryl sulfate or any other harmful chemicals or carcinogens |